National

Trump urged the Senate to send a climate plan for Paris to thwart Biden

Estimated presidential election Joseph R. Biden reiterated his vow to re-enter the Paris Agreement on the first day of his administration on Saturday, but it could be a problem if the enemies of the agreement could bring it to the Senate first. There is sex.

Behind-the-scenes conservatives are trying to thwart his plans by persuading President Trump to send a 2015 agreement to the Senate for ratification. Therefore, the Republican Party treats it as a treaty, as it says it should have been treated all the time.

“This preserves President Trump’s legacy, which also poses a major obstacle to Biden’s agenda,” said Myron Ebel, director of the Energy Environment Center at the Institute for Free Market Competitive Companies, which opposed the agreement. Said.

The Paris Agreement, or what Eber calls the “Paris Climate Treaty,” was approved by President Obama in September 2016 on the grounds of Republican opposition. Republicans say the deal is a treaty and two-thirds of the Senate votes for ratification, but this doesn’t happen.

Mr. Trump follows the rules incorporated in the Paris document to withdraw from the agreement, which was the official exit on November 4, and the Biden camp only needs another executive order to rejoin the agreement. I showed that.

But if Mr. Trump sends an agreement to the Senate after the start of the next parliament on January 3, the enemy of the agreement suddenly becomes a powerful new law to thwart Biden’s efforts to enter into the agreement through presidential action. Have a consensus.

“It will mark the Paris Agreement as a treaty that needs to be ratified by the Senate,” said Steve Milloy, publisher of JunkScience.com and a former member of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Trump Transition Team. It was.

The maneuver comes with Mr. Biden doubling his pledge to re-sign the deal on Saturday. It seeks to limit global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius from pre-industrial levels.

“The United States will rejoin the Paris Agreement on the first day of my inauguration,” Biden said when international leaders virtually gathered to celebrate the fifth anniversary of the agreement. “I will soon work with counterparts around the world to do everything possible, such as convening leaders from major economies for the Climate Summit within 100 days of taking office.”

Biden also emphasized the campaign’s promise to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050.

It will be difficult to get Mr. Trump’s attention as the Republicans continue to challenge the November election results, but if the road to 270 electoral votes is exhausted, opponents of the Paris Agreement will be his legacy. I hope you will pay attention to.

Under the Constitution, the treaty requires a two-thirds majority vote, so President Clinton did not submit the previous climate agreement, the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, for ratification.

“Obama did it [Paris] As an executive order to avoid being defeated in the Senate, “Miroy said. “That’s why Clinton never sent the Kyoto Protocol to the Senate because he was defeated.”

Who can get enough votes to clear the two-thirds hurdle, even if the Democrats win both Georgia Senate seats and a majority and cast a few votes from the moderate Republicans? I’m not thinking about it either.

Senate leader Mitch McConnell could bring the Paris Agreement to vote and defeat it, or simply sit on it. In any case, the Paris Climate Treaty will not win ratification.

“If it went there in January at the next parliamentary session, it would just sit there as a treaty,” Miloi said. “Even if the Democrats gained control of the Senate, it would have been submitted to the Senate. No one took it out because it failed. Two-thirds of the Senate is needed. “

Paul Driesen, Senior Policy Adviser, Free Market Commission for Constructive Tomorrow [CFACT]McConnell said he should force Senators to keep records.

“Mr. Trump can and should submit a treaty to the Senate for his advice and consent-and Senate leader Mitch McConnell should schedule debate and voting promptly. “Drysen said in a December 9 editorial. “All senators have a record-breaking opportunity. They are for or against the United States, and all individual states and families, treaties subject to unelected, irresponsible UN and foreign powers.”

Even if the strategy works, the Biden administration can try to avoid the lack of ratification, for example by signing another agreement or making a promise as an informal party.

“There are several ways to get around that, but I don’t think any of them are satisfactory, and I don’t think they will always work,” Ebel said.

Biodiversity Centers and other environmental groups argued that the Paris Agreement could be legally signed by executive order in 2016, and Senate ratification “needs the Obama administration to put the United States in a legally binding form. No, “he said.

“In fact, the standards for ratification of the US Senate are so high that about 90% of international treaties signed by the United States over the last 60 years are in the form of enforcement agreements,” the Center said in a fact sheet.

Proponents also point out that international agreements are not binding, but the enemy is as a club for the Biden administration and environmental groups to enact drastic restrictions on climate change through the US court system. I’m worried about using.

“The question is whether the Biden administration will use it as a legal justification for the next round of regulation that causes very economic and very costly damage. And as they do I It seems to me, “Ebel said. “It’s true that they appear in court and Congress hasn’t passed legislation to reduce emissions, but we have this international agreement, and we are the parties to it, and our commitment. You have to keep it, so this is the way we suggest it. “

Under the agreement, the United States has agreed to reduce emissions by 26% to 28% from 2005 levels by 2025. Even though the United States is the world leader in reducing carbon dioxide emissions, it has not reached that threshold and the agreement needs to be more ambitious. Commitment every 5 years.

For example, raising the US climate target to 50% emission reductions by 2035 would require drastic changes to the energy sector. This includes the abolition of coal-fired power plants, the replacement of natural gas with renewable energy, and the switch to gasoline vehicles. Electronic car.

Biden’s energy and climate plans also call for an ambitious review of the energy grid, but enacting such policies throughout the legislative process is one thing.

“It’s a big change, and they’ll be trying to do it under an international agreement that is essentially unsupported by the US Senate and, as a result, unsupported by the American people,” he said. Ebel said. “They have no legislative power, but they have this piece of paper called the Paris Agreement, so they may try to avoid it.”

Sign up for our daily newsletter



Trump urged the Senate to send a climate plan for Paris to thwart Biden

Source link Trump urged the Senate to send a climate plan for Paris to thwart Biden

Back to top button