In the blow to the fight against climate change, the Supreme Court on Thursday restricted how the country’s major air pollution control laws could be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants.
In a 6-3 vote with a majority of conservatives, the Court said the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming. rice field.
Court decisions can complicate government plans to combat climate change. The proposal to regulate power plant emissions is planned by the end of the year.
President Joe Biden aims to cut the country’s greenhouse gas emissions in half by the end of 2010 and to have a emission-free electricity sector by 2035. Power plants account for about 30% of carbon dioxide emissions.
The same day the judge warned that a UN panel report could make the world worse, hungry, poorer and more dangerous in the coming years as the effects of climate change worsen. , I heard the discussion of this case.
The power plant case has a long and complex history, starting with the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan. The plan would have required the state to reduce emissions from power generation, primarily by shifting away from coal-fired power plants.
But the plan never came into effect. The Supreme Court, which acted in proceedings filed by West Virginia and others, blocked it with a 5-4 vote in 2016, with the majority being conservative.
The plan was put on hold and the court battle over it continued. However, after President Donald Trump took office, the EPA abolished plans for the Obama era. Authorities argued that they had limited authority to reduce carbon emissions and devised a new plan to significantly reduce the role of the federal government in this matter.
New York, 21 other predominantly Democratic states, the District of Columbia, and some of the largest cities in the United States have filed proceedings over the Trump program. The Federal Court of Appeals in Washington ruled against both the abolition and the new plan, and while the new administration was drafting a new policy, that decision had no effect.
In addition to the extraordinary nature of the High Court’s involvement, the reductions sought by the Obama project by 2030 have already been achieved by the market-led closure of hundreds of coal-fired power plants.
A power plant operator servicing 40 million people has asked the court to maintain the flexibility of the company to reduce emissions while maintaining reliable service. Well-known companies such as Apple, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Tesla also helped the administration.
19 predominantly Republican-led states and coal companies led the Supreme Court battle with a wide range of EPA authorities that regulate carbon emissions.
The U.S. Supreme Court limits EPAs in controlling power plant emissions
Source link The U.S. Supreme Court limits EPAs in controlling power plant emissions