New York

The Supreme Court says some gun cases deserve a new look

The supreme court The restricted gun incident in Hawaii said Thursday, California, New jersey When Maryland Following a major decision in the gun incident last week, it deserves a new look.

In light of last week’s ruling, which stated that Americans have the right to carry guns out of the house, the court said lower courts need to revisit some of the cases awaiting proceedings by the High Court. rice field. These cases include large magazines, bans on assault weapons, and state law that restricts people who can bring guns out of the house.

Judges last week invalidated a New York law in a 6 to 3 ruling requiring people to show “justification” that they need to carry a gun if they want to carry it in public. did. Half a dozen states have similar laws questioned by the judgment.

In the case of New York, a conservative majority of courts gave lower courts new guidance on how to assess gun limits. The judge dismissed the appeal of the two-step approach that the court had previously used as one step too much. They said courts evaluating modern firearms regulations should ask if they were “consistent with the text of Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment and historical understanding.”

Sending other gun cases back to the lower court gives them the opportunity to apply the new guidance.

One of the cases the judge sent back to the lower court on Thursday involved Hawaiian law, similar to New York law. In that case, a committee of 11 judges from the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said in 2021 that Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment “holds and retains armed rights” is “free to carry armed rights openly.” Does not guarantee general rights. ” Publicly for personal self-defense. However, the High Court said in a recent gun case that the Constitution protects “the individual’s right to carry a pistol outside the home for self-defense.” The lower court needs to reconsider Hawaii’s decision.

The High Court has also ordered the Federal Court of Appeals to review cases, including California and New Jersey laws that limit the number of bullets a bullet store can hold. New Jersey law 2018 limits most gun owners to magazines that hold up to 10 ammunition, rather than the 15-shot limit since 1990. The lower court upheld this law.

California law also prohibits magazines that hold more than 10 bullets. A committee of 11 judges from the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 7-4 last year in support of the California ban.

The judge also sent back to further consider the case from Maryland, which challenged the state’s 2013 ban on 45 types of assault weapons. In 2017, the High Court dismissed an objection to the previous law.

The Supreme Court says some gun cases deserve a new look

Source link The Supreme Court says some gun cases deserve a new look

Back to top button