New York

The Supreme Court ruled against public debt hearings for exiles re-entering the United States

TheĀ· Supreme Court On Tuesday, the government said it could detain certain migrants indefinitely for fear of persecution in their own country if they were deported and then illegally re-entered the United States.

The court is divided 6 to 3 along the ideology, and immigrants who illegally re-enter the United States after deportation do not have the right to hear the court whether they should be released while the government is considering the allegations. I arbitrated.

The case involved those who had previously been deported and were detained after illegally re-entering the United States and claimed to be persecuted or tortured if sent back. One man said he was a citizen of El Salvador and was threatened by a gang immediately after being deported from the United States.

Immigration officials have determined that if migrants return to their country, there is a “reasonable fear” of their security and have begun an assessment process that can take months or even years.

A teenage immigrant girl will be loaded into a van on Saturday, April 17, 2021 to be taken from the National Christian Church Association facility in Houston.
A teenage immigrant girl is loaded into a van on April 17, 2021 to be taken from the National Christian Church Association facility in Houston.
AP

The court’s question was whether the government could detain immigrants without weighting immigration judges. Immigrants and the Trump administration outlined and discussed the case before President Joe Biden took office in January. Make each case.

Judge Samuel Alito wrote for the conservative majority, and the second provision “provides the detention of aliens subject to the resurrection of the removal order, that is, these aliens are removed. While pursuing a withholding, he is not eligible for a hearing. “

The Trump administration has appealed the decision of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, also insisted on a second clause, and claimed that migrants facing deportation would be released on public debt.

Associate Justice Samuel Alito
Judge Samuel Alito wrote a conservative majority opinion.
Pool via Getty Images / AFP

Arito seemed to nod to the debate in his ruling.

“In addition, foreigners who illegally re-entered the country after their removal have indicated their intention to violate the terms of the removal order, so they may be less likely to comply with the resurrected order,” he wrote. ..

Judge Stephen Buyer, in disagreement, constructed this issue in a different way.

Immigrant families walked in shallow water, mainly from Central American countries, after being delivered by smugglers in small inflatable rafts in the US soil of Rome, Texas.
Immigrant families walked in shallow water, mainly from Central American countries, after being delivered by smugglers in small inflatable rafts in the US soil of Rome, Texas.
AP

“But why does Congress want to refuse hearings to individuals who are reasonably afraid of persecution and torture and, as a result, face proceedings that can last for months or years …? I can’t find a satisfactory answer, “he wrote.

The Federal Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, ruled in favor of immigrants, while other Courts of Appeals supported the government. Tuesday’s decision sets national rules, but affects what lawyers for immigrants call a relatively small subset of non-citizens.

With post wire

The Supreme Court ruled against public debt hearings for exiles re-entering the United States

Source link The Supreme Court ruled against public debt hearings for exiles re-entering the United States

Back to top button