The judge will suspend proof of election results in Pennsylvania.Governor Tom Wolfe appeals

November 25th – The day after Pennsylvania proved the election results, Joe Biden in the presidential election showed that he had won the federation, a local judge ordered the suspension of further proof measures on Wednesday, and Governor Tom Wolf’s administration was the state’s highest. Requested to intervene in the court. A bitter appeal.

“Since the birth of our country about 250 years ago, to date no court has issued an order aimed at blocking the state’s confirmation of presidential electors,” the government has appealed. “In this case, there is no possible justification for the lower court to issue such an order.”

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s request states why intervention is appropriate to revoke a lower court order. This is because the allegations of petitioner Mike Kelley and other Republicans were futile, lacking status, and submitted too late. Above all, “lack of jurisdiction over the claimant’s allegations”.

According to court documents, the effects of the order, even if left unattended for a short period of time, could confuse the proof of election results in all states, seizing the seats of elected representatives and damaging voters’ will. The next term of the General Assembly will be postponed indefinitely. Throw “a completely unjustified cloud of Pennsylvania election results.”

An appeal to the Supreme Court was filed after Judge Patricia A. McCullough of the Republican Federal Court decided to issue an injunction while awaiting a preliminary hearing on Friday.

Federal Attorney General Josh Shapiro, Tweet The order will appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and will not affect the appointment of electors on Tuesday by proving the election results.

McCullough’s order was issued in response to a case filed by Kelly on Saturday, accusing him of being unconstitutional and asking the court to invalidate all 2.5 million mailed votes.

Plaintiffs argued that the law signed by Wolf in October last year to expand absentee and mail voting was unconstitutional because it needed to be a constitutional amendment.

“Law 77 is another illegal attempt to revoke the absentee ballot restrictions set out in the Pennsylvania Constitution, and the necessary steps to first amend the Constitution to everyone for expansion. I don’t comply, “said a court document.

President Donald Trump, who has filed several proceedings against the election results in major fierce battle states, including Pennsylvania, defended Kelly’s proceedings on Twitter.

“This is by no means insignificant,” he said. Tweet Flagged by including pending allegations about the election. “It’s done on behalf of one of the most respected members of the US Congress, who, like many others, is fed up with elections, which is a fraudulent turmoil.”

Rick Hansen, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine, wrote that McCullough’s orders did not hold.

“The order was issued in an exaggerated proceeding alleging that all mailed votes in Pennsylvania were illegal and invalidated elections in all offices,” he wrote in the election law blog. “This doesn’t stick because the case goes up the food chain.”

The judge will suspend proof of election results in Pennsylvania.Governor Tom Wolfe appeals

Source link The judge will suspend proof of election results in Pennsylvania.Governor Tom Wolfe appeals

Back to top button