Supreme Court NCAA ruling could be a death blow for an amateur model

Supreme Court unanimously on Monday NCAA violated antitrust law by limiting education-related compensation For that student athlete. Now, it may not be long before college players actually invest in the multi-billion dollar industry.

Lower court decisions in favor of former college athletes are narrowly supported, with schools paying for graduate scholarships, post-qualification internships, study abroad programs, academic tutors, computers, textbooks, musical instruments, and other education. can do. Base Benefits — In addition to standard undergraduate exercise scholarships. The ruling also recognizes good grades and / or limited cash rewards tied to graduation.

“Simply put, the proceeding involves horizontal price fixing allowed in the market where the defendant exercises exclusive control,” Judge Neil Gorsuch wrote in a court opinion.

More importantly, the 9-0 ruling is devastating to the traditional amateur model, which the NCAA claims remains a “decisive feature of college sports” and essential to its popularity and profitability. It may give a big blow.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh disagreed with his consent, perhaps providing a framework for future hearings, and student athletes challenged the NCAA’s ban on payments to athletes.

“The NCAA business model is totally illegal in most other industries in the United States,” Kavanaugh wrote. “Not all restaurants in the area can come together to reduce the wages of cooks. It is based on the theory that” customers prefer to eat food from low-paying cooks. ” Law firms cannot collusion with the salary of a cabin lawyer in the name of providing legal services out of “love for the law.” Hospitals cannot agree to limit the income of nurses in order to create a “pure” form that helps the sick. News organizations cannot work together to reduce payments to reporters in order to maintain the “tradition” of public journalism. Movie studios cannot collude to significantly reduce the profits of the camera crew to burn the “spirit of amateurism” in Hollywood. Price-fixing labor is price-fixing labor. Price-fixing labor is also usually a matter of textbook antitrust law, as it eliminates the free market where individuals can get a fair reward for their work.

An athlete stands near the NCAA logo during a softball game in Beaumont, Texas.
NCAA athletes were able to monetize immediately following the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision.
AP photo

“Tradition alone cannot justify NCAA’s decision to build a large funding company behind under-compensated student athletes. Their products have a fair market rate for their workers. Based on the theory defined by not paying, nowhere else in the United States companies can escape by agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate. And the NCAA Division I It’s not clear why college sports are different under the usual principles of NCAA is not beyond the law. “

Student athletes have already won big victories over the past year, and 19 states have declared that such individuals can benefit from their names, images and portraits (NILs). Several states will enact these laws on July 1. Monday’s ruling did not include NIL’s issue. This is part of the current parliamentary hearing..

Plaintiffs’ chief attorney, Jeffrey Kessler, has declared the court’s ruling “historic”, perhaps suggesting the inevitable end of NCAA amateurism.

“Hopefully, it will also open the door to further change, so that these great players can benefit from the financial outcomes of their labor and pursue their educational objectives. You can finally see a fair and competitive reward system, “Kessler said. In the statement. “Only then can we honestly say that the NCAA is dedicated to the welfare of student athletes.”

Senator Chris Murphy (Democratic Party) saw it as follows: One step closer to the end of the NCAA model..

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling highlights how much flow is going against the unfair treatment of NCAAs and college athletes,” Murphy said. “The current state of’amateurism’is finally changing, and the NCAA no longer has the discretion to control the lives of athletes and monopolize the market. This is a kind of justice and a basic right for college athletes. “

Supreme Court NCAA ruling could be a death blow for an amateur model

Source link Supreme Court NCAA ruling could be a death blow for an amateur model

Back to top button