Parliamentary riot surveillance video of journalists suing Congress on January 6

A proceeding filed in a federal court in Washington, DC requires that Congress disclose thousands of hours of January 6 Capitol riot surveillance video, which is at the heart of the court battle between prosecutors and the media.

A lawsuit filed by a non-profit law firm on Wednesday National security counselor On behalf of freelance journalist Sean Musgrave, it could have a significant impact on the legislature’s legislation governing the information that needs to be published.

In the proceedings, Mr. Massgraves’ request for video was US Capitol Police (((USCP) because police The footage claims that it is not a public record subject to common law access to public records.

However, California-based journalists claim that the video is certainly a public record subject to law, as surveillance tapes are used to prosecute those who participated in the riots.

NS USCPThe interest in keeping them secret is more important than the public’s interest in their disclosure, he said.

Musgrave’s representative, Kel McClanahan, told The Washington Times Thursday that “the first to decisively apply the common law’s right to access parliamentary records, rather than simply stating that it exists in some hypothetical form. It could be the case. “

“Once a concrete example is established, people can start thinking about how far it will spread, but until that happens, the legislature will have a mysterious cone of silence on the hill of the Capitol. We will continue to act as if we were, “said McClanahan.

The complaint on page 17 shows the consent of a judge in the local court of appeal in a case filed earlier this year by a judicial oversight seeking a subpoena from an impeachment investigation against then-President Donald Trump by the House Intelligence Commission. ..

Judge Karen Lekraft Henderson agreed that common law rights do not apply to subpoenas. This is because the Judiciary Watch did not fully assert that public interest was more important than the protection provided by the Constitutional speech or debate clause.

However, she said the clause did not explicitly state “absolute protection from disclosure-including protection from common law claims.”

“Nevertheless, the fundamental importance of the common law right to access to democracies … warns against the categorical expansion of speech or debate clause exemptions. [common law] That’s right, “the judge wrote.

Mr. Masgraves also appealed for the release of additional records he requested, but they were either rejected or unanswered.

Other requests include documents about the information sharing policy communicated by the House of Representatives. USCP Not only to develop, but also the latest version of the House Security Policy Manual. He also wants a copy of the report requested by the House of Representatives last year. USCP The investigator’s general report, produced over the last three years, may have been published.

“These record requests focus on the January 6, 2021 riots. USCP Lack of transparency from members of the House of Representatives and the Senate Security Department on issues surrounding the riots, and more generally the handling of sensitive information in Congress, “said the proceedings.

Defendants nominated in the proceedings USCP, House of Representatives Sergeant at Arms, Senate Secretary’s Office and its senior officials.

Sign up for our daily newsletter

Parliamentary riot surveillance video of journalists suing Congress on January 6

Source link Parliamentary riot surveillance video of journalists suing Congress on January 6

Back to top button