What’s New in the Supreme Court’s Decision on Gun Control in New York:
The American Medical Association calls this ruling a “harmful and very disturbing decision.”
“Firearm violence is a public health crisis, with easy access to weapons and less restrictions on who can and where they can carry weapons is a dangerous step in the wrong direction.” Dr. Jack Lesneck, President of AMA, said. Written statement. “Overturning decades of rational firearms regulations will cost more lives.”
California Governor Gavin Newsom called the ruling “dangerous” in a tweet, even on labels such as “Shameful” and “The Gloomy Day in the United States.”
“This is a dangerous decision from court hell that has pushed the radical ideological agenda and devoted itself to violating the state’s rights to prevent civilians from being shot in our streets, schools and churches.” He wrote.
Follow the Supreme Court’s AP report: https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court
New York — Rev. Al Sharpton, a civil rights leader headquartered in New York City, has accused the Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday as “catastrophic and potentially dangerous.”
“We have been working to escalate gun violence in the city, so this ruling couldn’t have come at a worse time,” Sharpton said. “It is more important than ever for Congress to pass meaningful legislation to combat the epidemic of gun violence in this country.”
One of the major concerns is the ability to carry guns in public places such as neighborhoods, streets and subways.
“The presence of guns in sensitive areas such as the New York Transit System is an unacceptable risk,” Page Graves, general counsel of the Metropolitan Transit Authority, said in a statement.
“In light of this Supreme Court ruling, we have begun drafting appropriate rules to keep dangerous weapons away from subways, buses and commuter trains,” Graves said.
Washington-Vice President Kamala Harris said Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling was “unconventional” and “unreasonable.”
“I’m deeply concerned and worried about the Supreme Court’s ruling,” Harris said, following a recent visit to Buffalo at the funeral of one of the victims, who killed 10 people and injured three in a May 14 shooting. I have. ” She also mentioned many other recent shootings.
“About American concerns about why it’s on the top page, so to speak, what we can do in terms of reasonable gun safety, and what we’re responsible for. , You can go down the list. The law, “Harris said.
New York — Some Republicans in New York supported Thursday’s ruling.
Lee Zeldin, a U.S. lawmaker running for Governor of the Long Island Republican Party who upheld the case, said the decision was “historical, appropriate and necessary for New Yorkers whose rights to Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment are constantly being attacked. It ’s a great victory. ” .. “
Nick Langworthy, chairman of the Republican Party of New York and a candidate for parliament, said the ruling was a national victory over politicians.
“Today’s Supreme Court ruling is what it should be and is the ultimate authority to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from the dictatorship,” Langworthy said.
Langworthy, Zeldin, and other Republicans have criticized Democrats for what they see as threatening new restrictions on gun owners rather than passing stricter criminal law.
Senator George Borrello, a Republican in western New York, called the ruling “verification of the second amendment to the US Constitution and the victory of gun owners in compliance with state law.”
Washington — Leaders of both parties in the US House of Representatives have responded in contrast to Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling.
Kevin McCarthy of California, Republican leader of the House of Representatives, welcomed the ruling and “justified all Americans who comply with the law the right to protect themselves without unnecessary government intervention.” Stated.
Nancy Pelosi, also chairman of the Democratic Party of California, said the ruling eradicated state authority to keep public spaces safe from gun violence.
“While families in Yuvalde, Buffalo and countless other communities mourn their loved ones stolen by gun violence, the majority of the Supreme Court has chosen to endanger the lives of more Americans. I don’t know, “Pelosi said in a statement.
Mr Pelosi said the decision was made by a “radical Republican-dominated court” using “twist logic.”
She promised that Democrats would continue their efforts to prevent gun violence.
New York — New York City officials claim that nothing will change shortly after Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling.
They state that the High Court has sent the case back to the lower court for further proceedings that may reveal details of the implementation.
Officials in the country’s most populous cities quickly reviewed the gun permit application process and began thinking about how to legally define “sensitive places” where civilians are not allowed to bring in guns.
“There is no place in the country where this decision will have as much impact as New York City,” Mayor Erik Adams said in a press conference. “And we are ready to set an example to guide the country: how do we counter this decision?”
Democrat and former police captain Adams has created anxiety about everyday controversy that turns into a shootout on a busy street or subway in New York. He suggested that police officers would not only face greater danger, but also the greater burden of distinguishing between legal and illegal guns in public places.
New York — Following a Supreme Court ruling on Thursday, at least one advocacy group has urged lawmakers not to pass regulations that continue to make it difficult for members of the black and brown community to own guns.
In a statement released by a nonprofit spokesperson, “The New York gun license rules are applied arbitrarily and discriminatory, disproportionately trapping the people we represent. Redmond Haskins.
The group recognized the ruling as “a positive step towards ending arbitrary licensing standards that hampered the possession of legal black and brown guns in New York,” and possession of guns by people of color. “It has never prevented violence, it just pushes its limits,” he said. Imprison people in the BIPOC community. “
Washington-U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal, a former Connecticut Attorney General and a key participant in bipartisan gun violence negotiations, called Thursday’s decision “very destructive” in a tweet. is.
He predicted that it would “unleash more gun violence on the American community.”
Blumental said the ruling would not “support common-sense safeguards to reduce gun violence,” but would put more guns in public.
Annapolis, Maryland — Democratic Attorney General of Maryland, Brian Frosh, examined Thursday’s ruling to determine its impact on Maryland and said, “We will continue to fight to keep Maryland’s people safe.” ..
“Today’s decision means more deaths and more pain in a country already full of gun violence,” Frosch said in a statement.
In a statement, Frosch argues that it is dangerous for people with firearms in public places to become the norm.
“The epidemic of gun violence that is sweeping our country shows every day the stupidity of introducing more guns into this boiling cauldron,” he said.
Washington — President Joe Biden said he was “extremely disappointed” with the Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday, which broke the 100-year-old limit on the carrying of hidden firearms in New York State.
In a statement, the president said the ruling “is inconsistent with both common sense and the Constitution and should bother us all deeply.” He added that after mass shootings across the United States, the country should do more to reduce the availability of firearms.
As Congress appears to approve modest gun law changes, Biden goes further into the state to “enact common law to make citizens and communities safer from gun violence. And enforce it. “
“I call on Americans across the country to hear their voice about gun safety. Life is at a loss,” he added.
New York — New York Mayor Eric Adams issued a statement on Thursday criticizing the US Supreme Court’s decision at the New York Rifle and Pistol Association v Brune.
He said the ruling “puts the New Yorker at additional risk of gun violence.”
Adams said the city is working to reduce the risk of gun violence in the city, including defining the license application process and reviewing “delicate places” where guns are banned. Said.
“We cannot allow New York to enter the Archetypal Old West, so we will work together to mitigate the risks that arise after this decision is implemented,” the statement said.
“This decision could have opened an additional river to water the sea of gun violence, but we will do everything we can to stop it,” he added. rice field.
Rhode Island Providence — Rhode Island Democrat Robert Craven said Thursday he wasn’t surprised by the ruling.
“I see the court heading in that direction,” he said. “Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment takes a stricter interpretation than absolute-it says it says, you have the right to arm.”
Craven, a lawyer and chairman of the State House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, questioned whether the court would use the same thinking process in proceedings over the ban on military-style weapons.
For hidden carry permits, New York requirements are more annoying than Rhode Island requirements. Craven said he represented the city of East Providence, Rhode Island, in three cases in which the denial of permits was challenged over the past decade, all three winning cases in the State Supreme Court.
Craven said he would read the views of the New York proceedings to determine if he could challenge Rhode Island’s requirements and whether they could be rectified by state law.
New York — New York state legislators responded to Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling, which invalidated the state’s gun law. US Rep. Elise Stephanik praised the ruling, saying she “correctly declares New York’s shameful attempt to shred the rights of New Yorkers to Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment.” Stephanique is a Republican and a solid ally of former President Donald Trump.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand called the ruling “irresponsible” and “totally dangerous.”
“Our country is in the midst of an epidemic of gun violence, and instead of working to protect our community, this court has put potentially dangerous people with hidden pistols in public. It’s even easier to carry, “said a Democrat.
New York — Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling invalidated the New York State Gun Law, which requires people to be shown the need to carry a gun in order to obtain a license to carry it, but in a background check. There is no direct impact on other laws, including rules. Age requirements for gun purchase.
This is due to Alex McCourt, Head of Legal Investigation, Gun Violence Solutions Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Instead, the court said it would reassess the law and determine if it violated Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment.
“These laws may face new challenges, especially those governing the public use of guns, which were not previously considered part of Article 2 of the Constitutional Amendment.” Said McCourt.
Live Update | Weighted by the American Medical Association | State News
Source link Live Update | Weighted by the American Medical Association | State News