Democrats have labeled their major election reviews “for people’s law” — but when pollsters talk to people themselves, many of them say they rather want to pass.
As Senate Americans are in terrible conflict, preparing to vote for legislation on Tuesday.
The legislation is about “voting access,” telling them that it will facilitate registration and pave the way for more convenient opportunities to throw ballots, and Americans are enthusiastic. But let them know that the law either invalidates the state’s voter identity law or creates a new taxpayer-funded financing system for federal campaigns, and that warmth diminishes.
“After all, most Democrats and Republicans seem to want to take the possibility that election results will be questioned from the table, but the problem is that they can agree on how to get there. It’s less likely, “said Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.
Monmouth released new data this week, with 50% of those surveyed assessing voting barriers as the number one concern for elections, while 37% said fraudulent voting was a major concern.
The majority (71%) said they needed to facilitate face-to-face voting, and 50% said they needed to facilitate mail voting. But at the same time, 80% said it made sense to ask voters to show photo ID.
The· Senate The bill spans 888 pages (886 pages in the house version) and envisions a complete overhaul of how the state conducts elections. All states must meet them, but it sets the standard in line with the most liberal or tolerant states.
When voters use government services, voters are directed to auto-registration and the state must allow registration on the day. Voting by mail is a mandatory option and the state cannot require witness or identification requirements. If you receive the ballot after the election day, you can count the ballots.
Legislation will also limit state efforts to cleanse names from electoral rolls.
It does not ban voter IDs, but it does impose a national workaround on those who do not have IDs that are more generous than many laws that require identification. It will also create an optional government-funded system for parliamentary campaigns.
Democracy Senate An aide confirmed on Monday that the bill is unlikely to clear parliament this year.The legislation cleared the House of Representatives by voting on the party line, but it was SenateThe Democratic rally has only 50 members and requires 60 votes to overcome filibuster.
“”Senate Republicans will not provide 10 votes to break the filibuster in a meaningful way, “said a Democratic aide. “And it is very unlikely that our caucuses will end the filibuster.”
Democrats have been calling for a review of their voting system for years. In fact, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi pushed for a radical version of the bill in early 2019, a year and a half before the 2020 elections.
Still, it was the election that infuriated both sides.
Senate Majority leader Charles E. Schumer accused former President Donald Trump on Monday of a “sneaky lie” that gave the Republican-controlled state legislature a mission to strengthen voting policies. He characterized this week’s expected vote as a chance to counterattack.
“My Republican friends like to say that they just want to be easy to vote in elections and hard to cheat, but when you look at what they’re actually doing, it’s hard and easy for Republicans to vote. It’s clear that we’re doing it to steal elections, “said the Democratic Party of New York.
Kentucky Republican minority leader Mitch McConnell said Democratic resentment and “racist condemnation” were hollow.
He said Democrats dominated the White House and “last fall got the election results they wanted.” Senate And keep the house, but they still want more.
“They have fully revealed that they are the real driving force behind them. [the bill] It’s a desire to permanently put in place the rules of American elections in favor of the Democratic Party. ” Senate Monday floor.
And, like McConnell and Schumer, polls in Monmouth showed a big difference in how Republicans and Democrats approached the issue. 89% of Democrats say voting should be easier than 56% of Republicans. Voter ID support is 91% for Republicans and 62% for Democrats.
Democrats these days seem to have decided that the voter ID clause of the law creates vulnerabilities. Many prominent leftists actually label it “voter oppression,” but rush to say they don’t oppose voter IDs.
Overall, Monmouth’s vote is tracked in a survey conducted on behalf of groups with vested interests in the results.
Right-wing costume state legislative action polled the public’s reaction when the bill was told to overturn the state’s voter ID requirements and allow more “public funding for political campaigns.” .. Nearly 55% say they are unlikely to support the bill under these provisions.
Left-wing cause-focused navigator research does not appear to be investigating these issues, but instead published a poll focusing on the extended access portion of the bill. They found strong support for more disclosure of election spending, increased voter registration opportunities, and reinstatement of felony voting rights after the sentence.
Pollster and former Supreme Legislative Assistant to the Trump White House, Michael McKenna, said the public did not yet understand the outline of the debate and, like many problems, liked some solutions. Said he didn’t care about other solutions.
He said some aspects of the bill would eventually rise to the top and voters would decide what was more important, but that hasn’t happened yet.
“It’s a hasty, unwise effort,” said McKenna, who also wrote a column for The Washington Times.
He said lawmakers should take a break and probably talk to state election officials about the implications of the bill.
One of those officials is Bill Gardner, Secretary of State of New Hampshire, who has been in the office since 1976.
Despite being a Democrat, he opposes efforts to federate elections on a radical mission. He said there are other ways to increase turnout other than abolishing voter integrity measures such as ID.
He said that in the 1990s, Oregon became the first state to hold postal elections, ballots were sent to all voters, and the Secretary of State tried to get him to do the same. Instead, New Hampshire relies on an absentee ballot system that requires legitimate excuses. On the other hand, those who vote directly are supposed to show their ID, but if they can’t, they can vote or have them take a picture, as long as the polling place’s election manager approves. spot.
Gardner said it’s working well — and in some ways better than the Oregon system. New Hampshire turnout is higher than Oregon turnout.
“This is factual information and we rarely see it,” he told The Washington Times. “People aren’t writing about this because groups traveling around the country are telling people that they need to be easier. That’s how we get more people to vote, It is not known. If. ”
•• Alex Swoyer contributed to this article.
“For People’s Law”, “Democratic” Election Review, American Division
Source link “For People’s Law”, “Democratic” Election Review, American Division