Controversial economics of abortion law

When economist Joshua Angrist was a young researcher in the mid-1990s, he saw wrinkles that gave the history of abortion law an opportunity to analyze. Many states had already had an abortion before the Supreme Court legalized the abortion nationwide in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. Professor Angrist, who is currently enrolled in MIT’s faculty, has focused on the states that legalized abortion by 1970 (Alaska, California, Hawaii, New York, Washington) for economic and economic access to abortion. I saw an opportunity to investigate the social impact. Some other liberalized restrictions.

His dissertation, “The Impact of 1970’s Atomic Reform on School Education and the Labor Market,” published in the book “Study of Labor Economics” in 2000, drew various conclusions. Early in the liberalization of the law, black women experienced a decline of more than 4% in teenage and illiterate births, accompanied by increased school education and employment. But white women did not see the same effect, and even black women later did not look so strong in their benefits in states where abortion became legal in Roe.

Controversial economics of abortion law

Source link Controversial economics of abortion law

Back to top button